Canon raw processing software

Unfortunately, the shadow slider in Capture One is too aggressive. With Lightroom, however, the shadow slider does a better job across a wider range of photography genres.

The slider will lift the shadows without impacting too much of the rest of the image. Despite the overall tone of the image I'm using in this article, Lightroom still manages to separate the shadow areas more effectively. In essence, I find Capture One to be more useful when it comes to managing highlights and Lightroom for managing shadows. Finally, we have the contrast slider and both programs seem to do a great job; however, the results are different. This helps you manage your contrast with a greater deal of precision.

With Capture One, the contrast slider only manages half that range, and it does feel like a shorter range. However, the major benefit of Capture One is that the contrast slider does not seem to affect colors in the same way that Lightroom down. When you add or remove contrast in Capture One, it only affects the lighting in the image and not the colors.

This is probably the most beneficial difference between the two apps. And it's actually most useful when removing contrast from an image.

In the comparison above, you'll notice how the Lightroom image is far less saturated than the Capture One file. Unfortunately, the Lightroom contrast slider will affect colors as well as the lighting in an image, and this makes it a less precise feature.

Capture One, however, offers a far more useful contrast slider purely because of how precise it is with its effect on lighting. Each software seems to manage files from each camera in a slightly different way. However, in the Canon 5DS R image, Capture One produces a more natural look, with skin tones appearing less saturated in comparison to what Lightroom produced.

It's difficult to say that one program is clearly better than the other, especially when you start doing more complex side-by-side comparisons. There are areas where one software will best the otherl however, from an overall perspective, each of the two offers some extremely useful benefits. For example, Lightroom will remain far closer to what you see on the back of the camera.

This is extremely useful because you're not going to end up with some weird surprises when you transfer files and start the editing process.

Unfortunately, Capture One isn't as consistent in that regard. Despite that fact, I personally do enjoy the look that Capture One produces, and I'll pick it over Lightroom for most meaningful projects.

In my experience, Capture One leans more towards accuracy, whereas Lightroom leans more towards the manufacturer's camera profile. As long as you don't use any of the Adobe profiles in Lightroom, the results it produces are brilliant. The biggest issue with Lightroom is how it manages contrast. Other than that, there is no clear winner.

When it comes to Canon raw files, either software will produce fantastic results. Check out the Fstoppers Store for in-depth tutorials from some of the best instructors in the business. Thanks for the comparison! Any thoughts on the responsiveness of each program when moving a slider and then waiting for an adjustment to be applied? Also, what about the times to import and export a large number of photos? Maybe another test down the road?! I will be perfoming those tests too just not in the image comparisons for the different manufacturers.

C1 states that the catalogue should be on the fastest drive possible - normally your computers main drive. It is sometimes necessary to endure that the external drive is spinning before opening C1 because if it is idle at the time of opening C1, the program will struggle a bit.

That said, once you move the files to fast drive and the catalogue to a fast drive ssd perhaps? And while I don't have a new M1 chip Mac, it is said that the program is blazing fast. This is to be confirmed. I currently use C1, but, I have to admit, Lightroom does look pretty good in these examples.

When I left LR back in , there was a night and day difference between the two in favor of C1. Not sure what the author means about the shadow recovery being too aggressive in C For such a simple comparison, I don't see why other RAW processing apps weren't included.

In the 11 years ive been working on photography sets with photographers from all over the world, ive only seen Lightroom twice. Fashion brands, advertising jobs, you name it, its always Capture, the industry standard. Granted if youre shooting weddings then youre usually not dealing with a team of industry pros, instead youre usually a one man show, maybe with a second shooter, both shooting to card and some day after, you'll be uploading to computer and editing at home.

This is where Lightroom shines. If you download Adobe Lightroom, you will have HDR and panorama stitching tools, enhanced performance, face recognition, mobile app and cloud integration, as well as first-class adjustments for lighting, color, geometry and lens profile at your disposal.

It lets you alter the white balance of the image at the post-processing stage and highlight more details. Lightroom converts RAW data from the camera sensor into a visible image using rendering profiles. Verdict: It is a Pro version of the RAW image editor for local adjustments with a complete set of tools created by Phase One, the camera manufacturer. Capture One stores your photos in both sessions and collections.

Sessions let you group photos by snapshots for different clients. Collections let you manually sort images, annotations — take notes or optimize collaboration. Capture One offers a keyword entry tool to tag photos with your own unique tags.

It supports layers, extensions and presets. For instance, the Format plugin lets you upload your work directly to the online portfolio to Format via the Capture One software. Besides, it is possible to send customers gallery checks and update your online blog. Advanced color editing gives you more flexibility with sliders to adjust color changes even for the same colors.

This image editing and ordering system boasts customizable interface parameters, individual profiles, presets, local U Point adjustment technology, manual and auto mode, color protection and multiple export formats. There is also a PhotoLibrary function with an AutoFill search tool. PhotoLab continues the tradition of lens-based image auto-correction, Canon lenses and camera body, unmatched noise reduction, and other innovative image improvements: new color tools, enhanced keyword functionality and a recovery tool.

In fact, all you have to do is find the images stored on your device and select them. You will get access to hundreds of presets, stackable filters and other image enhancement solutions: textures and borders, live settings and previews, as well as custom effects options. System requirements To use this software, your computer has to meet the following system requirements. Caution - Make sure to use Canon applications when importing movies to your computer.

Setup instruction Please refer to the instructions below on how to download and install the software. File information File name : dppw4. Was this helpful? Thank you!

Your feedback is used to help us improve our support content. It solved my issue. It covered my problem, but the solution still didn't work for me. The information on the page is hard to understand. It has nothing to do with my issue. Back to top. Other Canon Sites. You can also perform custom white balance operations to ensure that your images show their true colors every time, whatever the weather or light source. In this tutorial, we demonstrate how to make selective colour adjustments to create more colourful and visually stimulating images.

While this global adjustment might give a drab blue sky more impact, it could simultaneously make over-saturated skin tones look too orange. Best photo editing software : image editors for novices through to pros Best photo-editing laptops in top laptops for photographers Best online photography courses — from beginner guides to masterclasses Best recovery software for photos Best password manager.

Rod is the Group Reviews editor for Digital Camera World and across Future's entire photography portfolio, with decades of experience with cameras of all kinds. He has been writing about photography technique, photo editing and digital cameras since they first appeared, and before that began his career writing about film photography.

He has used and reviewed practically every interchangeable lens camera launched in the past 20 years, from entry-level DSLRs to medium format cameras, together with lenses, tripods, gimbals, light meters, camera bags and more.